Alexey Vatutin vs Franco Agamenone Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance shows Alexey Vatutin winning 43.75% versus Franco Agamenone's 42.98% of points. Does this mean Vatutin has a slight edge on the second serve? Yes, albeit minimal.
• In returning second serves, Vatutin holds a slight lead, capturing 49.39% compared to Agamenone's 49.29%. Could this impact the match's outcome? Potentially, in closely contested games.
• Conversely, Agamenone is better at returning first serves, with 32.24%, higher than Vatutin's 31.24%. This may provide an advantage in breaking serve.
• When under pressure, Vatutin saves 55.39% of breakpoints, while Agamenone saves 50.29%. This implies Vatutin is more resilient in critical moments.
• Looking at past performance, Agamenone boasts a higher win rate over the last year (64.86% vs. Vatutin's 56.52%). Could this sway momentum in his favor? Perhaps, as it indicates consistency.
• Career surface statistics reveal Vatutin excels on Hard courts (60%) and struggles on Grass (25%), whilst Agamenone is strongest on Clay (60%) and weakest on Grass (0%).
• Both players mainly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Agamenone winning more matches (61.36% vs. 52%).
• Agamenone has played against slightly lower-ranked players on average (431.74 vs. Vatutin's 401.33). Does this suggest anything? Yes, Vatutin faced tougher competition.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Agamenone has been more successful, winning 67% compared to Vatutin’s 52%.
• Break point conversion rates show Agamenone being slightly more effective, converting 40.47% to Vatutin's 36.51%, an important factor during critical points.

Editorial Prediction (November 25, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the stats for this upcoming match, Alexey Vatutin and Franco Agamenone both present unique strengths and weaknesses.

Vatutin shows higher resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. Meanwhile, Agamenone's superior break point conversion could give him the edge in clutch moments. Vatutin's performance against stronger opponents indicates a competitive spirit, but Agamenone's decisive set victories suggest a mental toughness in marathon matches.

Both players have similar triumphs in their competing circuits, but Agamenone’s overall win rate this year and his proficiency in deciding sets could prove decisive. Taking into account recent form, matchups, and individual strengths, Franco Agamenone appears to have a slight edge and is most likely to win this match.